RESURRECTING MISTAKES

1. AUTHORNichols L; Aronica P; Babe C
INSTITUTIONDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania, USA.
TITLEAre autopsies obsolete?
SOURCEAm J Clin Pathol  1998 Aug;110(2):210-8
ISSN0002-9173
ABSTRACTTo determine the current frequency of discovering important diagnoses at autopsy, the diagnoses made in all complete or "no head" autopsies during 1994 at a major tertiary care transplantation referral center were retrospectively compared with the diagnoses made antemortem. Of 176 autopsies, 79 (44.9%) revealed 1 or more undiagnosed causes of death. Of the 123 undiagnosed causes of death, 13 were sole immediate causes of death, 72 were one of multiple immediate causes, 22 were intervening causes, and 16 were underlying causes. The causes of death were as follows: infections, 34; infarctions, 11; malignant neoplasms, 8; pulmonary emboli, 7; gastrointestinal ulcers, 7; hemorrhages, 6; thromboses, 3; amyloidosis, 1; genetic hemochromatosis, 1; and cardiac tamponade, 1. Of 35 autopsies of transplant recipients, 16 (46%) disclosed undiagnosed causes of death, compared with 63 (44.7%) of 141 autopsies of patients who had not received transplants. Approximately two thirds of the undiagnosed causes of death were judged to be treatable conditions. This and similar studies suggest that old-fashioned low-technology autopsies can uncover many important diagnoses missed by modern high-technology medicine.
2. AUTHORVeress B; Alafuzoff I
INSTITUTIONDepartment of Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden.
TITLEA retrospective analysis of clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in 3,042 cases during two different time periods.
SOURCEHum Pathol  1994 Feb;25(2):140-5
ISSN0046-8177
ABSTRACTThe accuracy of clinical diagnoses was determined and compared between the two periods of time 1977 to 1978 and 1987 to 1988 based on the analysis of 3,042 autopsies at Huddinge University Hospital. The discrepancy rates were calculated by counting the number of missed or incompletely diagnosed major diseases and their complications. Moreover, sensitivity, specificity, and clinical accuracy for positive and negative diagnoses also were calculated for all cases of acute myocardial infarction and malignant tumors. The autopsy rate decreased from 80% to 39%. The autopsy successfully addressed the clinical questions in 97% of the cases. The selection of the cases possibly could explain the significant 5% increase in the proportion of clinically undetected major underlying diseases. The discrepancy rate was higher among the older patients. There were no significant changes in the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases apart from thrombosis of the mesenteric artery, which more than doubled. The proportion of infectious diseases increased significantly from 27% to 32%. The number of cases with clinically missed tuberculosis was twice as high in the 1987 to 1988 period as in the 1977 to 1978 period and there was a marked increase in fungal and viral infections. There was no significant change in the clinical diagnosis of malignant tumors between the two periods. Approximately 15% of all major cancers were not diagnosed before autopsy; half of these tumors were lethal. We conclude that the role of the autopsy has not diminished in spite of advanced diagnostic methods and it remains an effective tool in the assessment of medical care.
 

[Return to article]

Copyright © 2009 Electronic Handbook of Legal Medicine