Failure to diagnose Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) is a common cause of action in medical malpractice litigation. Though breach of Standard of Care may be proven, Causation is often difficult to establish.
Both recreational drugs and (particularly in over-dosage) prescription medications that stimulate the sympathetic nervous system - cocaine[1], norepinephrine, thyroxine[1a], phenylephrine[1b] - may trigger Myocardial Infarction in people with Coronary Heart Disease and even in otherwise normal individuals. There is some evidence[1c] [full-text] that the dihydropyridine calcium antagonists such as Adalat (nifedipine), rather than protecting the heart, may actually increase the probability of Myocardial Infarction in patients with Coronary Heart Disease.
Long-term prevention of a first heart-attack consists mainly of addressing well-publicised life-style risk factors - obesity, sedentary habits, smoking - and detecting and treating high blood pressure and high cholesterol. Estrogen replacement for postmenopausal women, modest alcohol consumption and Vitamin E supplements may contribute. These health risks and benefits need to be, and usually are, addressed to some extent whether or not CHD is present or is likely to be present[1d].
| PRACTICE
POINT Standard medical care requires identification and treatment of the major causes, whether or not Coronary Heart Disease is diagnosed |
Only in exceptional circumstances is it possible to show on the balance of probability that failure to detect or treat one remediable risk factor - blood pressure or cholesterol, for example - would have made a material difference to the subsequent development of a first heart-attack.
In the short-term, however, the situation has changed during the last few years. A recent review article[2] on the efficacy of drug therapy in suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction summarised the evidence from the many very large clinical studies on Aspirin, Heparin (blood-thinner) and Fibrinolytic (clot-dissolving) Therapy.
Misdiagnosis of unstable angina and Acute Myocardial Infarction is one of the top 5 causes of successful malpractice litigation following discharge from the Emergency Room[2a]. Inadequate history-taking[2b] and failure to undertake or correctly interpret an ECG and cardiac enzymes[2c] account for the majority of cases.
The bottom-line is that prescribing half a regular adult aspirin on suspicion of a developing heart-attack is the most important therapy.
| PRACTICE
POINT Critical actions on suspecting a heart-attack are: 1 half an aspirin |
For certain ElectroCardioGraphic (ECG) findings confirming Acute Myocardial Infarction, Fibrinolytic Therapy materially reduces the risk of death, particularly if given within 12 hours of the onset of symptoms.
| PRACTICE
POINT If ECG and cardiac enzymes are nondiagnostic, failure to hospitalise will likely be shown to have a material effect only if remediable complications developed |
Emergency Angioplasty (reaming)[3] or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG)[4] are currently being evaluated[5] for some situations.
Should remediable complications of heart-attack, such as life-threatening arrhythmia (disturbance of regular rhythm) occur, failure to hospitalise because of missed diagnosis may be shown to have materially reduced probability of survival or long-term health.Copyright © 2008 Electronic Handbook of Legal Medicine