"Psychiatrists have no special knowledge or ability with which to predict dangerous behavior. Studies have shown that even with patients in whom there is a history of violent acts, predictions of future violence will be wrong for two out of every three patients." So concludes the American Psychiatric Association Statement on Dangerousness[1].
PRACTICE POINT Assessment of Dangerousness remains an inexact science |
Can a psychiatrist or psychologist reasonably be held responsible for the suicide of a patient? Recent clinical research[2] suggests that for risk of violence in a newly hospitalised patient, clinical judgment can be considerably more accurate, and that certain characteristics, for instance male or nonwhite, distort the appraisal in a predictable way.
Assessment of risk of suicide is a daily activity of emergency psychiatric services. Despite a lack of precision in forecasting, a number of authors[3], [4], [5], [6] have summarised the principal variables. If the various risk factors have not been quantified, or are inadequately documented or addressed, care-givers may be held liable for early suicide.
PRACTICE POINT Components
of adequate suicide risk assessment: |
Unconsented third party involvement in the decision-making process presents considerable legal difficulty but may be required for a competent assessment of risk. A physician or psychologist who fails to make the reality check when appropriate may be found to have contravened community standards.
Copyright © 2008 Electronic Handbook of Legal Medicine